Simon Luo WeiI Ching Strategic Advisory

The 64 hexagrams

Biting Through

噬嗑

21. Biting Through

shì kè; Decisive enforcement

Judgment

噬嗑:亨。利用狱。

Success. It furthers one to administer justice. Something blocks the jaws; bite through it and they close—remove obstacles, judge clearly.

Image

雷电,噬嗑;先王以明罚敕法。

Thunder and lightning: the image of biting through. The ancient kings made firm the laws through clearly defined penalties.

Lines

  1. Line 1, yang (nine)

    初九:屦校灭趾,无咎。

    His feet are fastened in the stocks, so that his toes disappear: no blame. Small faults, small and early correction.

  2. Line 2, yin (six)

    六二:噬肤灭鼻,无咎。

    Bites through tender meat so that his nose disappears: no blame. A bit of excess force, no serious harm.

  3. Line 3, yin (six)

    六三:噬腊肉,遇毒;小吝,无咎。

    Bites on old dried meat and strikes on something poisonous: slight humiliation, no blame. Tackling old abuses brings backlash—still necessary.

  4. Line 4, yang (nine)

    九四:噬干胏,得金矢,利艰贞,吉。

    Bites on dried gristly meat, receives metal arrows. It furthers to be mindful of difficulties and persevere: good fortune. Hard problems need firmness.

  5. Line 5, yin (six)

    六五:噬干肉,得黄金,贞厉,无咎。

    Bites on dried lean meat, receives yellow gold. Persevering, aware of danger: no blame. The judge must be central and fair.

  6. Line 6, yang (nine)

    上九:何校灭耳,凶。

    His neck is fastened in the wooden cangue so that his ears disappear: misfortune. Ignoring repeated warnings ends in disaster.

In the enterprise

The hexagram of compliance, disciplinary action and removing obstacles: internal control and anti-fraud, misconduct cases, breaking deadlocks in negotiation, process bottlenecks. 'Clearly defined penalties': clear rules, consistent enforcement.

Psychological lens

Resonates with criminological evidence that certainty of sanction matters more than severity; the top line describes defensive avoidance of feedback.

Related hexagrams

Situations in the library that use this hexagram

Situation readings are a reflective framework for discussion—not predictions and not a substitute for professional advice.